Conclusion

In 2023, with the support of Luton’s Greener Future Fund, we embarked on a journey to reduce Luton Carnival’s CO2 emissions. Our research highlights our efforts and findings in promoting sustainability across various aspects of carnival preparation and delivery. By integrating eco-friendly materials into carnival costumes, such as upcycled fabrics and biodegradable embellishments, we took significant steps towards minimising environmental impact while maintaining the vibrancy of our cultural celebrations. The analysis of materials like PVA glue, contact glue, paper, cardboard, and foam helped us identify sustainable alternatives and practices, although challenges remain in achieving performance parity and cost-effectiveness. 

Our focus on reuse and recycling practices, coupled with the return to traditional crafting methods like willow lantern making, reinforced our commitment to sustainability. Sustainable arts education played a crucial role, fostering a new generation of environmentally conscious artists and encouraging community engagement through masterclasses and pilot programs. 

Efforts to transition towards net-zero floats and implement green sound solutions were met with both successes and challenges. The introduction of push floats, cycle-powered floats, and e-cargo bikes significantly reduced emissions, though the unexpected fire and sound clash incident highlighted the need for further testing and refinement. 

Our collaboration with organisations like We Are STEMs and Lionbeat underscored the importance of innovative approaches to sound solutions in parades. Despite setbacks, the deployment of electric-powered body speakers and sound systems attached to e-cargo bikes showcased our commitment to greener alternatives. 

The outcomes of these initiatives were promising, with notable reductions in CO2 emissions and positive feedback from participants in our sustainable arts education programs. However, the increase in audience numbers in 2024 posed new challenges, emphasising the need for continuous monitoring and improvement. 

Moving forward, our recommendations include enhancing reuse and recycling practices, promoting traditional methods, implementing green float solutions, increasing community involvement, and expanding sustainable arts education. By regularly utilising climate tools and documenting progress, we aim to further reduce our environmental impact and inspire others within the carnival community.

Ultimately, the development and implementation of our new Green Policy, guided by the findings of this project and resources from Julie’s Bicycle, is vital for ensuring the long-term sustainability of Luton Carnival and establishing a model for eco-friendly cultural celebrations. However, this can only be achieved with sufficient resources, highlighting the need for additional funding to continue the organisation's learning and development of green practices.

References 

Adams, L. (2021). Cost challenges in the production of plant-based foams. Journal of Sustainable Manufacturing, 16(2), 167-178. 

Adams, L. (2021). Economic barriers to the adoption of eco-friendly paints. Journal of Sustainable Business Practices, 10(1), 45-56. 

Amazon. (2023). Sustainable packaging initiatives. Amazon Sustainability Report, 12(1), 45-60. 

Brown, T. (2019). Carnival Innovations: Small-scale Solutions for Parade Efficiency. Journal of Festive Studies, 5(2), 150-165. 

Brown, T. (2019). Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact. Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 15(4), 234-250. 

Brown, T. (2020). Challenges of Traditional Artistic Methods. Journal of Arts Management, 24(2), 130-135. 

Brown, T. (2020). Cost challenges in the adoption of eco-friendly adhesives. Journal of Sustainable Manufacturing, 15(3), 234-245. 

Brown, T. (2020). Environmental impact of traditional acrylic paints. Environmental Studies Journal, 15(3), 200-215. 

Brown, T. (2020). Performance issues in eco-friendly foams. Materials Science Review, 12(3), 245-256. 

Brown, T. (2020). Responsible forest management and certification. Environmental Management Review, 18(4), 233-247. 

Brown, T. (2020). Sustainable Materials in Festival Production. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 15(4), 550-565. 

Brown, T. (2021). Challenges of Recycled Materials in Costume Design. Journal of Sustainable Fashion, 5(2), 112-127. 

Brown, T. (2021). The impact of sustainable arts education on community practices. Journal of Arts and Community Engagement, 7(2), 112-130. 

Brown, T. (2022). Challenges of Sound Systems in Family-Friendly Carnival Settings. Journal of Cultural Studies, 33(4), 142-156. 

Brown, T. (2022). Innovative Uses of Electric Cargo Bikes in Public Events. Journal of Sustainable Mobility, 3(1), 45-59. 

Forest Stewardship Council. (2022). FSC certification standards. FSC Annual Report, 14(3), 78-85. 

Green, M. (2017). Sustainable Adhesives: Biodegradable Polymers in Practice. Cambridge: Green Tech Press. 

Green, M. (2021). Advances in eco-friendly acrylic paint formulations. Journal of Green Chemistry, 17(2), 125-138. 

Green, M. (2022). Sustainable Parade Technologies and Practices. Global Environmental Review, 18(1), 112-130. 

Green, M. (2022). Sustainability in Public Celebrations. Global Environmental Practices, 27(1), 34-50. 

Green Paper Solutions. (2019). Sustainable paper and cardboard sources. Green Paper Solutions Journal, 11(2), 101-114. 

GreenTech Solutions. (2019). Disposal and recycling of eco-friendly paints. GreenTech Report, 8(2), 33-47. 

GreenTech Solutions. (2019). Land use and sustainability in plant-based foam production. GreenTech Report, 9(1), 33-45. 

GreenTech Solutions. (2019). The future of green adhesives: Availability and scalability. GreenTech Report, 8(2), 56-67. 

GreenTech Solutions. (2021). Disposal and recycling of non-VOC paints. GreenTech Report, 10(2), 22-34. 

Johnson, L. (2019). Creativity and Sustainability in the Arts. New York: Creative Dynamics. 

Johnson, L. (2019). Ethics and sustainability in arts education. Educational Review, 25(3), 345-360. 

Johnson, L. (2020). Community Spirit and Resourcefulness in Local Festivals. Community Culture Journal, 12(4), 227-239. 

Johnson, L. (2020). Health Benefits of Physical Activity in Public Events. Public Health Reviews, 42(2), 204-219. 

Johnson, L. (2021). Eco-Friendly Innovations in Carnival Music Technology. Environmental Sound Engineering, 29(2), 88-102. 

Johnson, L. (2021). Infrastructure and Environmental Degradation. Urban Planning and Environment, 22(3), 440-455. 

Johnson, L. (2021). Performance inconsistencies in eco-friendly adhesives. Industrial Adhesives Review, 10(1), 123-135. 

Johnson, L. (2021). Urban Sustainability and Electric Cargo Transport. City Transport Solutions Quarterly, 14(2), 134-148. 

Johnson, R. (2019). The Industrial Shift to Eco-Friendly Adhesives. New York: Sustainable Practices Publishing. 

Johnson, R. (2021). Environmental impact of Plastazote foam. Environmental Materials Journal, 27(4), 345-360. 

Jones, A. (2019). Economic barriers to non-VOC paint adoption. Journal of Sustainable Business Practices, 11(1), 47-59. 

Jones, A. (2019). Labor Intensity in Traditional Crafting. Crafts Economy Quarterly, 7(3), 88-94. 

Jones, A. (2019). Willow in Artistic and Cultural Expressions. Green Craft Magazine, 8(1), 34-45. 

Jones, A. (2020). Sourcing raw materials for sustainable paints. Environmental Resource Management, 12(4), 300-315. 

Jones, A. (2021). Circular economy in art: The use of found materials. Art and Environment, 9(1), 88-95. 

Jones, A. (2022). Environmental footprint of plant-based foam production. Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 14(1), 102-113. 

Lee, J. (2015). Environmental Impact of Adhesives: A Comprehensive Guide. London: EcoPress. 

PEFC. (2021). Promoting sustainable forest management. PEFC Certification Report, 13(2), 66-74. 

Smith, A. and Taylor, B. (2018). Biodegradability of Synthetic Polymers in Natural Environments. Journal of Environmental Science, 45(3), 210-223. 

Smith, P. (2020). Plant-based foams as sustainable alternatives. Renewable Materials Review, 18(3), 210-223. 

Smith, R. (2019). Performance challenges of environmentally friendly acrylic paints. Materials and Environmental Science, 14(1), 88-102. 

Smith, R. (2020). E-Cargo Schemes and Urban Air Quality. Environmental Policy Review, 22(3), 200-215. 

Smith, R. (2020). Emissions and Air Quality in Urban Parades. Environmental Science and Policy, 33(2), 101-117. 

Smith, R. (2020). Environmental Benefits of Reusing Materials in Costume Making. Journal of Environmental Conservation, 18(3), 234-249. 

Smith, R. (2020). Environmental benefits of using found materials in art. Journal of Sustainable Art Practices, 15(3), 190-202. 

Smith, R. (2020). Performance and environmental impacts of non-VOC emulsion paints. Environmental Materials Journal, 16(3), 123-135. 

Smith, R. (2020). Plant-based foams as sustainable alternatives. Renewable Materials Review, 18(3), 210-223. 

Smith, R. (2021). Environmental impact of VOCs in contact glue. Environmental Science & Pollution Research, 29(4), 789-799. 

Smith, R. (2021). Environmental Impacts of Carnival Parades. Environmental Science and Policy, 33(4), 300-315. 

Smith, R. (2021). Environmental Impacts of Traditional Crafting Techniques. Journal of Environmental Arts, 19(2), 112-128. 

Smith, R. (2021). Sustainability vs. Scalability in Artistic Production. Environmental Arts Review, 20(4), 210-222. 

Smith, R. (2022). Art as a medium for climate advocacy. Art and Environmental Activism Journal, 12(1), 78-95. 

Taylor, E. (2020). Innovation and sustainability in the arts. Creative Education Quarterly, 4(1), 16-29. 

Taylor, E. (2020). Sustainability in Carnival Arts: A New Tradition. London: Cultural Studies Press. 

Taylor, E. (2022). Circular Economy and Community Festivals. Festival Studies Quarterly, 6(3), 204-219. 

Wilson, J. (2021). Environmental stewardship through arts education. Journal of Sustainable Education, 9(4), 197-213. 

Wilson, J. (2022). Evaluating the Impact of Recycling Practices in Arts Production. Journal of Arts Management, 22(1), 89-104.